Abusive Conduct Under California Law: Definition and Remedies

Abusive conduct under California law is workplace behavior — by an employer or employee — carried out with malice that a reasonable person would find hostile, offensive, and unrelated to the employer’s legitimate business interests. The definition lives in Government Code Section 12950.1, and its main job is to trigger a training requirement, not to create a new lawsuit. That means an employee mistreated by a workplace bully has protection only when the bullying also ties to a protected characteristic like race, sex, or disability. If it doesn’t, the legal path is much narrower than most people expect.

What the Statute Defines as Abusive Conduct

Section 12950.1 gives three examples of what abusive conduct can look like: repeated verbal abuse such as insults or derogatory remarks; physically or verbally threatening behavior that a reasonable person would find intimidating or humiliating; and the deliberate sabotage or undermining of a person’s work performance.1California Legislative Information. California Government Code 12950.1

Malice and a pattern are both key. A single incident generally doesn’t qualify unless it is especially severe and egregious.1California Legislative Information. California Government Code 12950.1 Think of a supervisor who routinely belittles a subordinate in front of coworkers, or a colleague who systematically claims credit for another person’s work while quietly damaging their projects. A one-time rude comment or a heated argument over a deadline doesn’t meet the threshold.

The behavior also has to be unrelated to any legitimate business interest. Firm performance feedback, an unpopular reorganization, or a demanding but fair manager doesn’t become abusive conduct just because someone finds it unpleasant.

Why Abusive Conduct Usually Isn’t Its Own Lawsuit

This is the part that trips people up. California defines abusive conduct and requires training about it, but the statute does not create a standalone right to sue over abusive conduct by itself.

Unlawful harassment under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act is a separate concept. It requires that the offensive behavior be tied to a protected characteristic — race, sex, gender identity, age, disability, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, or another category listed in Government Code Section 12940.2California Legislative Information. California Government Code 12940 A supervisor who targets you because of your race or gender is committing unlawful harassment. A supervisor who is equally cruel to everyone, without regard to any protected class, may be engaging in abusive conduct without giving rise to a private FEHA claim.

California’s regulations spell out that Section 12940(k), which requires employers to take reasonable steps to prevent discrimination and harassment, has no standalone private cause of action. A private claimant must also prove an underlying claim of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation based on a protected characteristic. The California Civil Rights Department can pursue non-monetary preventive remedies on its own, but an individual employee generally cannot sue an employer solely for tolerating a workplace bully.3California Civil Rights Department. California Code of Regulations Title 2 Section 11023 – Harassment and Discrimination Prevention and Correction

When Abusive Conduct Becomes Actionable

Once the mistreatment connects to a protected characteristic, FEHA’s full framework applies. Section 12940 holds employers responsible for harassment by supervisors, coworkers, and even non-employees when the employer knew or should have known about it and failed to correct it.2California Legislative Information. California Government Code 12940

FEHA damages are uncapped, unlike federal Title VII claims. A successful harassment claim can result in:

  • Compensatory damages for emotional distress
  • Back pay and lost benefits
  • Punitive damages
  • Attorney’s fees
  • Injunctive relief ordering the employer to change its practices

Individual harassers can also be held personally liable for their own conduct.2California Legislative Information. California Government Code 12940

For treatment that doesn’t tie to a protected characteristic, an employment attorney may still be able to explore other legal theories, such as intentional infliction of emotional distress or wrongful constructive termination, depending on the facts.

What to Do If You’re Experiencing Abusive Conduct

Start with documentation. Write down dates, times, what was said or done, who was present, and how the behavior affected your work. Save emails, messages, and any performance records that show the pattern. Contemporaneous notes carry more weight than a reconstruction months later.

Use your employer’s internal complaint channel. Reporting through HR or a designated complaint procedure puts the employer on notice, which matters legally if the conduct is tied to a protected class, because FEHA liability often turns on whether the employer knew and failed to act.

If the behavior is linked to a protected characteristic, you can file a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department. The deadline for employment cases is three years from the date of the last harmful act.4California Civil Rights Department. Complaint Process Filing options include:

  • Online through the California Civil Rights System (CCRS) portal
  • By phone at 800-884-1684 (voice) or 800-700-2320 (TTY)
  • By mail or email using an employment intake form from the CRD website
  • In person at a CRD office

Employees who already have an attorney and want to head straight to court can request a right-to-sue notice from the CRD rather than waiting for the agency to investigate. Filing a complaint or requesting a right-to-sue notice is free.5California Civil Rights Department. How to File a Complaint

Retaliation is its own violation. If an employer punishes a worker for reporting abusive conduct or harassment — through demotion, negative reviews, hostile schedule changes, or heightened scrutiny — that creates separate liability under state and federal law. Protected activity includes filing a complaint, participating in an investigation, or raising concerns to a supervisor.6U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Retaliation Retaliation claims sometimes succeed even when the underlying harassment claim does not.

Employer Training Obligations

Employers with five or more employees must provide sexual harassment prevention training that includes a component specifically on preventing abusive conduct.1California Legislative Information. California Government Code 12950.1 The five-employee threshold counts anyone regularly providing services under a contract, not just W-2 workers.

The cadence and duration depend on the role:

  • Supervisory employees: at least two hours every two years
  • Non-supervisory employees: at least one hour every two years
  • New hires: trained within six months of hire or of assuming a supervisory role
  • Short-term employees hired for less than six months: trained within 30 calendar days of hire or within 100 hours worked, whichever comes first
  • Employees who work fewer than 30 days and fewer than 100 hours: exempt
7California Civil Rights Department. Sexual Harassment Prevention Training – Information for Employers FAQ

Training must be interactive; a one-way recorded lecture doesn’t satisfy the requirement. The abusive conduct piece is meant to sit inside the broader harassment prevention program, not stand as a separate course. Employers who skip the training face potential enforcement action from the CRD, and a documented, current training record is one of the stronger defenses if a harassment lawsuit later arises.