D.C. home rule is the arrangement created by the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973, which gave Washington, D.C. residents an elected mayor and city council for the first time in roughly a century while leaving Congress with final authority over the city.1Council of the District of Columbia. D.C. Home Rule Before the Act, three federally appointed commissioners ran the District with no democratic input from the people who lived there. Public Law 93-198 changed that, but the local government it created operates under layers of federal oversight that no state faces.2Council of the District of Columbia. District of Columbia Home Rule Act
What D.C. Residents Got: An Elected Mayor and Council
The Act set up a thirteen-member Council of the District of Columbia as the legislative branch and an elected Mayor as the executive. The Council has a chairman elected citywide, four additional at-large members elected citywide, and one member from each of the eight wards.1Council of the District of Columbia. D.C. Home Rule All members serve four-year terms and run on a partisan basis.2Council of the District of Columbia. District of Columbia Home Rule Act
The Council drafts and passes local laws covering traffic rules, tenant protections, tax rates, zoning, and the usual range of city business. The Mayor signs or vetoes those laws, runs city agencies, and proposes the annual budget. On paper, it looks like city government anywhere else. The differences show up in what the Council is not allowed to do and in what happens after a bill is signed.
What the Council Still Cannot Do
Section 602 of the Home Rule Act lists subjects the Council has no authority over, no matter how much local support a proposal attracts. The main restrictions:
- No tax on property belonging to the United States or any state. Given how much land the federal government occupies in Washington, this carves a major hole in the city’s potential tax base.3D.C. Law Library. District of Columbia Code 1-206.02 – Limitations on the Council
- No tax on any portion of the personal income of someone who does not live in the District. Hundreds of thousands of people commute into D.C. daily from Virginia and Maryland, earn paychecks there, and use its infrastructure, but their wages are off-limits.3D.C. Law Library. District of Columbia Code 1-206.02 – Limitations on the Council
- No change to the Height of Buildings Act of 1910, which generally caps building height at the width of the adjacent street plus twenty feet.4National Capital Planning Commission. Height of Buildings Act 1910
- No law affecting the organization or jurisdiction of the D.C. Superior Court or the D.C. Court of Appeals.3D.C. Law Library. District of Columbia Code 1-206.02 – Limitations on the Council
- No legislation touching the functions or property of the United States, and no law reaching beyond D.C.’s borders.3D.C. Law Library. District of Columbia Code 1-206.02 – Limitations on the Council
Congress Reviews Every Law D.C. Passes
Once the Mayor signs a Council bill, it goes to both chambers of Congress for a mandatory review period before it can take effect. Most legislation faces a thirty-day layover. Criminal legislation faces sixty days.5Council of the District of Columbia. How a Bill Becomes a Law If Congress does nothing during that window, the law goes into effect.
To block a D.C. law, Congress must pass a joint resolution of disapproval through both the House and Senate and have it signed by the President.6Council of the District of Columbia. Legislative Process Flowchart The full process is cumbersome enough that Congress rarely completes it. The threat still shapes what the Council attempts.
In 2023, Congress passed a joint resolution disapproving the D.C. Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022. The bill had gone through years of local deliberation to modernize the District’s criminal statutes. After the sixty-day review period triggered scrutiny, both chambers voted to block it and the President signed the resolution. It was the first time in decades Congress had used this power.
The Budget Depends on Congress
D.C. raises most of its own revenue through property taxes, income taxes, and sales taxes. The divergence from state practice is what happens next. The Mayor develops an annual budget, and the local portion still gets submitted through the President to Congress as part of the federal appropriations process.7DC Council: Office of the Budget Director. Budget Formulation and Approval
In 2012, D.C. voters passed the Local Budget Autonomy Amendment Act, which attempted to shift the local portion of the budget to a passive thirty-day congressional review similar to how legislation is handled.7DC Council: Office of the Budget Director. Budget Formulation and Approval The Government Accountability Office concluded that the amendment has no legal effect without affirmative congressional action, meaning the federal Antideficiency Act still prevents D.C. from spending local funds without a congressional appropriation.8U.S. Government Accountability Office. District of Columbia–Local Budget Autonomy Amendment Act of 2012 D.C. remains bound to the congressional appropriations calendar.9Office of the Mayor. Q and A on Budget Autonomy
Two practical problems follow. When Congress operates under continuing resolutions or shuts down, D.C. gets caught in the crossfire despite having its own balanced budget ready to go. And Congress routinely attaches policy riders to the D.C. appropriations bill that restrict how the city can spend its own locally raised money. Riders have historically blocked D.C. from using local funds to regulate a commercial cannabis market and from implementing various public health programs, regardless of local voter preferences.10Congressional Research Service. District of Columbia FY2025 Budget Status: In Brief
Courts, Prosecutors, and Prisons Stay Federal
Home rule left the justice system largely outside local control. Judges on the D.C. Superior Court and D.C. Court of Appeals are nominated by the President from a list prepared by the D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission, then confirmed by the U.S. Senate.11D.C. Law Library. District of Columbia Code 1-204.33 – Nomination and Appointment of Judges They serve fifteen-year terms, routinely outlasting the mayors and council members whose laws they interpret.12D.C. Law Library. District of Columbia Code 11-1501 – Appointment and Qualifications of Judges
Prosecution is also split. The United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, a federal appointee within the Department of Justice, handles all adult felonies and many misdemeanors.13United States Department of Justice. About the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia The elected D.C. Attorney General prosecutes juvenile cases and certain adult misdemeanors, including DUI, traffic offenses, and some gun-related charges.14Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. Public Safety The Council can pass criminal laws, but it does not pick the judges who interpret them or the prosecutor who decides whether to charge.
D.C. runs its own jail for pretrial detainees and people serving misdemeanor sentences, but has no state-level prison. Under the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997, people convicted of D.C. felonies serve their time in Federal Bureau of Prisons facilities scattered across the country, sometimes hundreds or thousands of miles from their families and legal counsel.
The National Guard Answers to the President
State governors can activate their National Guard without asking Washington. The D.C. Mayor cannot. The D.C. National Guard is the only Guard unit out of all fifty-four states and territories that reports solely to the President, with that authority delegated to the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army.15District of Columbia National Guard. About Us For situations involving civil unrest, the Mayor must ask the President to deploy the Guard. This chain of command became visible during the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, when the delay in federal authorization left the D.C. government unable to deploy its own Guard members while the crisis unfolded blocks from city hall.
No Vote in Congress
D.C. residents pay federal income taxes like residents of every state. They pay more in total federal taxes than the residents of twenty-six states and more per capita than any state.16Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton. As Deadline Approaches, Norton Says Federal Tax Filing Season Reminder DC They have no voting representation in Congress. The District’s sole federal legislator is a non-voting delegate in the House, who can sit on committees, vote in committee, introduce bills, and participate in floor debates, but cannot vote on final passage of any legislation.17DC Statehood. FAQ D.C. has no representation at all in the Senate. The same Congress that reviews every D.C. law and controls its budget includes no one accountable to D.C. voters on Election Day.
Statehood as the Next Step
The most direct response to the limits of home rule is statehood. The Washington, D.C. Admission Act, reintroduced as H.R. 51 in the 119th Congress on January 3, 2025, would shrink the federal district to a small area covering the Capitol, White House, National Mall, and other federal buildings, then admit the remaining residential areas as the fifty-first state.18United States Congress. H.R.51 – 119th Congress (2025-2026): Washington, D.C. Admission Act As of early 2025, the bill was referred to multiple House committees and has not advanced to a vote in either chamber.
Opponents argue statehood requires a constitutional amendment and point to the Twenty-Third Amendment, which grants the federal district electoral votes, as a complication. Supporters say Congress has authority to shrink the federal district without amending the Constitution and that the Twenty-Third Amendment can be addressed afterward. The House passed statehood bills in 2020 and 2021, but neither received a Senate vote. For now, D.C.’s roughly 700,000 residents remain where the Home Rule Act left them: with more self-governance than they had before 1973, and less than the residents of any state.