New York’s Penal Law treats fraud as a family of offenses rather than a single crime, with separate articles for identity theft, insurance fraud, health care fraud, residential mortgage fraud, forgery, and multi-victim schemes to defraud. Penalties scale with the dollar amount involved and the method used, running from up to one year in jail for a Class A misdemeanor to as much as 25 years in prison for a Class B felony. Prosecutors routinely stack charges when one deceptive act violates more than one statute, and a conviction brings fines, mandatory restitution, and collateral consequences that outlast any sentence.
The Specific Fraud Offenses
The charge you face depends on how the fraud was carried out, who was harmed, and what you were trying to obtain. Each statute has its own degree structure, and the degree usually turns on a dollar threshold.
Identity Theft
Article 190 covers using someone else’s personal information, such as a Social Security number, bank account, or credit card, to commit fraud or other crimes.1Justia. New York Penal Law Article 190 – Other Frauds Charges run from a misdemeanor for basic identity theft up to a Class D felony for aggravated identity theft, with the degree set by the dollar amount involved and whether the victim suffered direct financial loss. A newer variant, sometimes called synthetic identity fraud, combines real and fabricated details to create a wholly new identity used to open credit accounts.
Insurance Fraud
Article 176 covers submitting false or inflated claims to an insurance company.2Justia. New York Penal Law Article 176 – Insurance Fraud Fifth-degree insurance fraud is a Class A misdemeanor. The offense escalates by dollar amount through the degrees, with first-degree insurance fraud (a Class B felony) reserved for schemes exceeding $1 million. Workers’ compensation and health insurance scams often sit here.
Health Care Fraud
Article 177 separately targets billing schemes aimed at Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurers. The thresholds are:
- Fifth degree (Class A misdemeanor): any fraudulent payment.
- Fourth degree (Class E felony): payments exceeding $3,000.
- Third degree (Class D felony): payments exceeding $10,000.
- Second degree (Class C felony): payments exceeding $50,000.
- First degree (Class B felony): payments exceeding $1,000,000.3New York State Unified Court System. Penal Law Article 177 – Health Care Fraud
Residential Mortgage Fraud
Article 187 covers knowingly submitting a materially false written statement, or concealing material facts, during the mortgage application, underwriting, or closing process.4NY Courts. Residential Mortgage Fraud in Each Degree Penal Law 187.05-187.25 Common examples include forged income documents, inflated appraisals, and straw-buyer arrangements where a fake purchaser fronts the transaction. Federal prosecutors can bring parallel charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1014, which punishes false statements on loan applications to federally connected institutions with up to $1 million in fines and 30 years in prison.5Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 U.S. Code 1014 – Loan and Credit Applications Generally
Scheme to Defraud
When fraud involves a pattern of deception aimed at multiple people, prosecutors often charge scheme to defraud under Penal Law 190.60 or 190.65. Second-degree scheme to defraud (a Class A misdemeanor) applies when you engage in a plan to defraud more than one person. First-degree scheme to defraud (a Class E felony) kicks in when that scheme results in obtaining property worth more than $1,000 from one or more victims.6New York State Senate. New York Penal Law 190.65 – Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree Prosecutors favor this charge because it captures the full scope of a fraud operation rather than treating each transaction as a separate offense.
Securities Fraud
Securities fraud in New York is prosecuted mainly under the Martin Act in Article 23-A of the General Business Law, not the Penal Law. The statute gives the Attorney General unusually broad authority: the AG does not need to prove the defendant intended to defraud anyone, only that satisfactory evidence of fraudulent practices exists.7New York State Senate. New York General Business Law 353 – Action by Attorney-General That makes Martin Act charges easier to bring than comparable federal securities cases, which generally require proof of scienter.
Felony Classes and Prison Exposure
Maximum sentences in New York are set by the felony class of the conviction, not by the specific fraud statute. For fraud-related offenses the ranges are:
- Class A misdemeanor: up to 1 year in jail.
- Class E felony: up to 4 years in prison.
- Class D felony: up to 7 years.
- Class C felony: up to 15 years.
- Class B felony: up to 25 years.8New York State Unified Court System. Types of Criminal Cases
Judges have sentencing discretion, and first-time offenders convicted of lower-level fraud may receive probation rather than prison. Incarceration becomes more likely as the dollar amounts grow and the victim count rises. Repeat offenders face mandatory minimums under New York’s persistent felony offender provisions.
Fines and Restitution
For a felony conviction, the court can impose the higher of $5,000 or double the defendant’s gain from the crime.9New York State Senate. New York Penal Law 80.00 – Fine for Felony The double-the-gain provision is where fraud fines get large. If you netted $500,000 from a fraudulent scheme, the court could impose a $1 million fine on top of restitution and prison time.
Restitution is a separate obligation. Under Penal Law 60.27, courts routinely order defendants to repay victims the full amount of their losses, and restitution is mandatory in many fraud cases. It can be imposed as part of a sentence or as a condition of probation, and it survives incarceration: victims can enforce any outstanding balance as a civil judgment after you complete your sentence.
In corporate fraud cases, courts and regulators can also bar individuals from serving as officers or directors of public companies or from participating in certain financial industries.
Related Charges Prosecutors Stack With Fraud
Fraud rarely travels alone on a charging document. Two companion offenses show up in almost every significant case.
Grand larceny tracks the same dollar thresholds as many fraud statutes. Fourth-degree grand larceny (a Class E felony) applies when stolen property exceeds $1,000. The degrees climb through third degree (over $3,000), second degree (over $50,000), and first degree (over $1,000,000, a Class B felony). Because fraud and larceny overlap so often, a defendant can face both a fraud-specific charge and a grand larceny charge arising from the same conduct.
Forgery under Article 170 covers creating or altering documents with intent to deceive.10Justia. New York Penal Law Article 170 – Forgery and Related Offenses Third-degree forgery is a Class A misdemeanor and covers ordinary written instruments. First-degree forgery jumps to a Class C felony when the forged document is currency, a government-issued instrument, or a similar high-value document. Forged bank statements supporting a fraudulent loan can produce both a mortgage fraud charge and a forgery charge from a single document.
What Prosecutors Must Prove, and the Defenses That Work
Fraud is a specific-intent crime in New York. The prosecution must prove you knowingly made a false statement or engaged in deceptive conduct with the purpose of gaining something you were not entitled to. That intent requirement is the main opening for the defense.
Lack of Intent
The most frequently raised defense is that you did not intend to deceive anyone. A business deal that goes bad is not fraud if you genuinely believed the representations you made at the time. If the prosecution cannot prove you knew a statement was false when you made it, the fraud charge fails. The case often turns on what the defendant knew, when they knew it, and what documents or communications support that version of events.
Good Faith
Closely related is good faith. If you honestly believed a venture would succeed, that your promises would be kept, and that your representations were accurate, a jury can find you lacked the intent to defraud even when the venture collapsed. Good faith is a complete defense because it directly negates the mental state the prosecution must prove. The burden stays on the prosecution throughout; you do not have to prove good faith so much as raise enough evidence of it to create reasonable doubt.
Duress
In rare cases, a defendant argues they acted only because they faced an immediate, credible threat of serious physical harm. The threat must have been imminent, and the defendant must have had no reasonable opportunity to escape. Courts set a high bar. If you had time to contact law enforcement or walk away, duress will not hold.
Entrapment
If law enforcement or a government agent induced you to commit a fraud you would not otherwise have committed, entrapment may apply. New York uses a subjective test focused on whether the defendant was predisposed to commit the offense. A person who readily participated when given the chance will struggle to claim entrapment; someone with no prior history of dishonest conduct who was pressured into it stands on firmer ground.
How Long Prosecutors Have to Charge You
New York imposes time limits on fraud prosecutions, and the clock does not always start when you might expect. Most felony fraud charges must be brought within five years of the alleged act under Criminal Procedure Law 30.10.11Justia. New York Criminal Procedure Law 30.10 – Timeliness of Prosecutions; Periods of Limitation Misdemeanors generally have a two-year window. For schemes involving ongoing concealment, however, the clock may not start until the fraud is actually discovered, which matters in complex financial cases where deception goes undetected for years. Tolling provisions can also pause the clock if the defendant leaves New York or takes other steps to avoid prosecution.
The civil side runs on a separate clock. Civil fraud claims generally must be filed within six years of the fraud under CPLR 213(8), with a discovery rule giving a plaintiff up to two years from the date they discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) the fraud, whichever is longer.12New York State Senate. New York Civil Practice Law and Rules 213 – Actions to Be Commenced Within Six Years A criminal acquittal does not block a civil suit; the civil standard of proof is lower.
When Federal Charges Enter the Picture
Many frauds that violate New York law also violate federal statutes, and a defendant can face prosecution in both systems. Federal prosecutors typically get involved when the fraud crosses state lines, uses the U.S. mail or electronic communications, targets a federal institution, or involves dollar amounts large enough to attract the FBI or the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.
The two federal statutes that catch the widest range of fraud are mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341) and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343). Mail fraud applies whenever a fraudulent scheme involves placing anything in the mail or using a private carrier.13Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 U.S. Code 1341 – Frauds and Swindles Wire fraud covers the same conduct using phone calls, emails, or any electronic communication. Both carry a maximum of 20 years in prison, rising to 30 years when the fraud targets a financial institution.
Federal sentencing uses the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which apply a loss table that adds offense levels based on the dollar amount of the fraud. The increases are steep: a loss over $250,000 adds 12 levels, a loss over $1.5 million adds 16, and a loss over $65 million adds 24.14United States Sentencing Commission. Loss Table Combined with enhancements for number of victims, sophisticated means, and abuse of a position of trust, federal sentences can run dramatically longer than comparable state sentences.
The Department of Justice’s internal policy generally discourages federal charges when a state prosecution has already adequately addressed the conduct, but prosecutors make exceptions when there is a compelling federal interest.15U.S. Department of Justice. Criminal Resource Manual 682 – Successive Prosecutions In large-scale New York fraud cases, defendants should prepare for the possibility of federal charges running alongside the state case.
Consequences That Outlast the Sentence
Prison and fines are only part of what a conviction costs. Three categories of collateral consequence hit fraud defendants especially hard.
Immigration
For non-citizens, a fraud conviction is almost always classified as a crime involving moral turpitude, which can make you deportable or inadmissible.16U.S. Department of State. Foreign Affairs Manual – Ineligibility Based on Criminal Activity The State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual specifically lists fraud and identity fraud as moral turpitude offenses. A single conviction can block a visa, prevent adjustment to lawful permanent resident status, or trigger removal proceedings. Limited waivers exist but require meeting strict conditions.
Professional Licensing
Fraud convictions can lead to revocation or suspension of licenses in law, medicine, accounting, real estate, and financial services. New York licensing boards have authority to deny, revoke, or suspend licenses based on criminal conduct that reflects on fitness to practice. In the securities industry, FINRA imposes a statutory disqualification period of ten years from the date of any felony conviction and for certain misdemeanors, barring you from associating with any FINRA member firm for the duration.17FINRA. General Information on Statutory Disqualification and Eligibility Proceedings
Firearms
Any felony conviction in New York costs you the right to possess firearms under both state and federal law. Federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) prohibits anyone convicted of a crime punishable by more than one year of imprisonment from possessing a firearm. Restoration of federal firearm rights is technically possible under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c), but the process has been effectively unavailable for decades because of a congressional funding ban on processing applications, though the Department of Justice has indicated it is developing a new application process.18U.S. Department of Justice. Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Under 18 U.S. Code 925(c)