An interlocutory appeal in Florida lets you ask a district court of appeal to review a trial court’s order before the case ends, but only for a defined set of nonfinal orders listed in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. For orders outside that list, your only shot at immediate review is a discretionary petition for certiorari. Either way, the clock is 30 days from the date the order is rendered.
Which Nonfinal Orders Qualify Under Rule 9.130
Rule 9.130 identifies specific categories of nonfinal orders that can be appealed as of right, meaning you do not need the appellate court’s permission to proceed. If your order does not fit one of these categories, this route is closed.
The commonly invoked categories include orders that:
- Concern venue, so a refusal to transfer a case to the proper county can be challenged immediately rather than after litigating in the wrong location.
- Grant or deny injunctions, because injunctions force action or inaction right away and waiting for final judgment could cause serious harm.
- Determine jurisdiction over a person, letting a defendant with a minimal connection to Florida challenge the ruling before defending the case.
- Determine the right to immediate possession of property, which covers writs of replevin, garnishment, and attachment.
- Involve family law matters, including orders granting or denying immediate monetary relief, determining child custody or time-sharing under a parenting plan, or declaring a marital agreement entirely invalid.
The rule also reaches several less common but equally appealable situations: orders deciding entitlement to arbitration or an appraisal under an insurance policy, class certification, whether a settlement agreement is unenforceable or never existed, forum non conveniens, workers’ compensation immunity, sovereign or qualified immunity in civil rights claims, appointment of a receiver, disqualification of counsel, and leave to add a punitive damages claim.1Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.130 Proceedings To Review Nonfinal Orders and Specified Final Orders
Orders You Cannot Appeal Before Final Judgment
Most trial court rulings do not qualify. The system is built that way on purpose. If every disputed ruling triggered a separate appeal, cases would grind to a halt.
The denial of a motion to dismiss is one of the most common orders people want to appeal and cannot, unless the motion rested on a ground Rule 9.130 specifically covers, such as personal jurisdiction or immunity. A judge deciding your lawsuit has enough merit to continue is not the kind of ruling the appellate courts will review mid-case. Orders denying summary judgment sit in the same bucket. The logic: if you win at trial, the denied motion becomes irrelevant, and if you lose, you can raise it on appeal from the final judgment.
Discovery disputes are another frequent frustration. An order forcing you to produce documents or answer interrogatories, even if you believe it is overbroad, is almost never appealable before final judgment. Courts assume any error can be corrected on appeal after trial. The exception is when a discovery order threatens to expose genuinely privileged information, which may open the door to certiorari review.
Certiorari When Rule 9.130 Does Not Apply
When a nonfinal order falls outside every Rule 9.130 category, a petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 9.100 is the only route to immediate appellate review. Certiorari is discretionary. The appellate court can deny the petition without explanation, and most are denied.
To have any real chance, you need to show two things. The trial court’s order must be a departure from the essential requirements of law, meaning the judge violated a clearly established legal principle in a way that produced a genuinely unjust result. And the order must cause irreparable harm that cannot be fixed after a final judgment. The classic example is an order compelling disclosure of attorney-client communications: once the other side reads them, the privilege is gone regardless of what happens at trial.
A certiorari petition must be filed within 30 days of rendition, the same deadline as an appeal by right, but the petition itself is a substantial document with jurisdictional statement, facts, argument, and an appendix of the relevant record.2Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.100 Original Proceedings
Filing the Notice of Appeal
For orders appealable by right under Rule 9.130, the process starts with a Notice of Appeal filed with the clerk of the lower court where the order was entered, not with the appellate court. That filing kicks off the appeal and puts the opposing party on notice.
What the Notice Must Contain
The Notice of Appeal follows the standard form in Rule 9.900(a). It identifies the parties, the case number, the court, the date the order was rendered, and the nature of the order being appealed. You must name the appellate court with jurisdiction. Attach a conformed copy of the order. Your attorney’s name, address, email, phone number, and Florida Bar number go at the bottom.3Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.900(a) Notice of Appeal
The 30-Day Clock
You must file the Notice of Appeal within 30 days of the order’s rendition. Under Rule 9.020, an order is rendered when a signed, written order is filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal. That date controls, not the date you received the order or learned about it.4Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.020 Definitions Miss the deadline and the appellate court loses jurisdiction. Good arguments on the merits will not save it.
Certain post-order motions, such as a timely motion for rehearing, can toll rendition. If a motion listed in Rule 9.020(h)(1) is filed on time, the order is not considered rendered until the court disposes of that motion, which effectively extends your window. Only motions the rule specifically recognizes toll rendition.4Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.020 Definitions
Filing Fee
Along with the Notice of Appeal, you pay $300 to the clerk of the district court of appeal. A cross-appeal costs $295.5Florida Senate. Florida Statutes Chapter 35 Section 22 State agencies appearing as appellant are exempt.
What Happens After You File
Once the Notice is filed and the fee paid, the process moves fast. The compressed schedule reflects the fact that interlocutory appeals are meant to be quicker than appeals from final judgments.
The Initial Brief
The appellant must serve an initial brief within 15 days of filing the Notice of Appeal, accompanied by an appendix containing the relevant portions of the lower court record. The appellee’s answer brief and any reply brief follow the schedule in Rule 9.210.1Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.130 Proceedings To Review Nonfinal Orders and Specified Final Orders Fifteen days is very little time. In practice, you should be drafting the brief before you file the notice.
The Record
Unlike appeals from final judgments, the record in an interlocutory appeal stays with the lower tribunal unless the appellate court specifically orders its transmission under Rule 9.130(d).1Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.130 Proceedings To Review Nonfinal Orders and Specified Final Orders You supply the key documents through the appendix. That keeps the process lean, but it puts the burden of assembling the record on you.
Cross-Appeals
If the opposing party wants to challenge a different aspect of the same order or a related nonfinal ruling, they can file a cross-appeal within 15 days of being served with your Notice of Appeal, or within the original 30-day appeal window, whichever is later. The cross-appeal notice goes to the lower tribunal clerk with the $295 filing fee.1Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.130 Proceedings To Review Nonfinal Orders and Specified Final Orders
Does the Trial Court Keep Going
Yes, unless you get a stay. Filing an interlocutory appeal does not freeze the case below. Under Rule 9.130(f), the lower tribunal can continue with all matters, including trial. The one thing it cannot do without the appellate court’s permission is enter a final order disposing of the entire case.1Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.130 Proceedings To Review Nonfinal Orders and Specified Final Orders
To pause proceedings, file a motion for stay in the lower tribunal under Rule 9.310. The trial court has discretion to grant, modify, or deny the stay and may require a bond. A granted stay remains in effect through all review proceedings in Florida courts until a mandate issues, unless the court modifies or vacates it earlier.6Rules for Florida Appellate Procedure. Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure – Rule 9.310 Stay Pending Review
Stays are not guaranteed, and many trial courts are reluctant to grant them because they slow the case. You are more likely to succeed when winning the appeal would render continued litigation pointless, such as an appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. If the appellate court agrees, everything the trial court did in the meantime was wasted effort.
Risks of a Weak or Frivolous Filing
An interlocutory appeal is not a cost-free delay tactic, and courts watch for parties who use it that way. Under Rule 9.410, the appellate court can impose sanctions for frivolous filings, including reprimand, contempt, striking of briefs, dismissal of the appeal, an award of costs and attorney’s fees, or other penalties the court deems appropriate.
The practical costs matter too. You pay the $300 filing fee, pay your attorney for briefing on a tight schedule, and risk damaging your credibility with the trial judge who will still be running the rest of your case. If you lose, you go back to the same courtroom having spent money and time for nothing. The 15-day briefing window also pulls your attorney’s attention away from the ongoing litigation below. Filing should reflect genuine confidence that the trial court committed a reviewable error, not a hope that a second set of judges might see things differently.