Landlord Carpet Replacement Law in North Dakota

North Dakota landlord carpet replacement law lets a landlord charge a tenant for carpet damage that goes beyond normal wear and tear, but only up to the carpet’s remaining depreciated value. When the carpet fails because of age or becomes a health or safety hazard, replacement is the landlord’s expense. The rules sit in Chapter 47-16 of the North Dakota Century Code, and the outcome of most disputes turns on two documents: the move-in condition statement and the itemized deduction list the landlord must send after move-out.

Wear and Tear Versus Damage the Tenant Pays For

North Dakota Century Code 47-16-07.1 lets a landlord deduct from a security deposit for cleaning and repairs needed to return the unit to its original condition, but it explicitly excludes “reasonable wear and tear.”1North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Century Code 47-16 – Leasing of Real Property The statute does not define the phrase, so the line is drawn case by case.

Wear and tear is the deterioration that comes from someone simply living in the unit. Slight matting in hallways and doorways, minor fading near windows, small indentations from furniture legs. A landlord who charges for any of that is deducting for something the statute protects.

Damage is different. Large stains from spilled liquids, burn marks, rips from dragging heavy objects, and pet urine soaked into padding or subfloor all qualify. The statute allows charges for “deteriorations or injuries” caused by the tenant’s negligence or the tenant’s pet.1North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Century Code 47-16 – Leasing of Real Property The controlling word is negligence. The landlord has to show the carpet’s condition came from something the tenant did or failed to do, not from time passing.

How Much a Landlord Can Actually Charge

Even when a tenant genuinely damages the carpet, the landlord is not automatically entitled to the full cost of new carpet. Carpet loses value over time, and a landlord can only recover the value that remained at the moment of damage. The IRS assigns residential rental carpet a five-year recovery period under the general depreciation system.2Internal Revenue Service. Publication 527 – Residential Rental Property Those schedules exist for tax purposes, but courts around the country routinely use them as a reasonable benchmark for what carpet is still worth.

Here is how the math tends to work. Say the landlord installed $2,000 carpet with a five-year useful life. The carpet loses about $400 in value each year. If the tenant damages it three years in, two years of value remain, and the tenant’s maximum liability is roughly $800, not $2,000. If the carpet is already five years old or more, the landlord may have no valid claim at all because the carpet has been fully depreciated. Making a tenant pay full price for brand-new carpet to replace old carpet gives the landlord an upgrade at the tenant’s expense, and North Dakota’s “reasonable justification” standard does not support that.

When the Landlord Must Replace Carpet at Their Own Cost

North Dakota Century Code 47-16-13.1 requires landlords to keep rental units in “fit and habitable condition” and to comply with building and housing codes that affect health and safety.3North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Code 47-16-13.1 – Landlord Obligations – Maintenance of Premises The statute does not name carpet, but flooring that creates a health or safety problem falls under that duty. Carpet saturated with mold after a water leak, flooring giving off strong chemical odors, edges frayed badly enough to catch a foot — these are the landlord’s problem to solve, at the landlord’s expense, regardless of who caused the underlying issue.

Habitability does not force a landlord to replace carpet for looks. Ugly carpet that functions safely is not a code violation. The duty kicks in when the condition creates a real risk of injury or illness, and the landlord gets “a reasonable time” after being notified to make the fix.3North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Code 47-16-13.1 – Landlord Obligations – Maintenance of Premises

The Move-In Statement That Decides Most Disputes

Under North Dakota Century Code 47-16-07.2, the landlord must provide a written statement describing the condition of the rental unit when the lease is signed. Both parties sign it, and it becomes the legal record of the unit’s condition at the start of the tenancy.1North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Century Code 47-16 – Leasing of Real Property

This document decides most carpet disputes before they start. If the carpet already had stains, worn patches, or loose seams at move-in and those problems appear on the signed statement, the landlord cannot charge the tenant for them later. The North Dakota Attorney General’s office warns that tenants are presumed to have caused any damage not listed on the statement.4North Dakota Office of Attorney General. Tenant Rights That presumption cuts hard. Skip the walk-through, or sign the statement without noting existing carpet problems, and the landlord has a strong argument that any damage happened during the tenancy. Timestamped photos on move-in day, with every carpet flaw recorded on the statement, are the practical defense.

Deposit Rules and the 30-Day Itemization

North Dakota caps the standard security deposit at one month’s rent. A landlord cannot collect more under any label, with two narrow exceptions: tenants with a prior felony conviction or a previous judgment for violating a rental agreement may be asked for up to two months’ rent.1North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Century Code 47-16 – Leasing of Real Property

Pets get their own category. A landlord can charge a separate pet security deposit of up to the greater of $2,500 or two months’ rent. That deposit cannot be charged for service animals or companion animals required as a reasonable accommodation under fair housing law.1North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Century Code 47-16 – Leasing of Real Property Because pet-related carpet damage is one of the most common deduction fights, the higher pet deposit limit gives landlords more cushion for flooring claims involving animals.

After the tenant vacates and surrenders possession, the landlord has 30 days to either return the full deposit or send an itemized list of deductions with any remaining balance, mailed or delivered to the tenant’s last known address. Vague entries like “carpet” or “cleaning” fall short. The list should say what the charge covers, such as removing pet stains from the bedroom carpet or patching a torn section in the living room. General turnover cleaning for carpet that just looks lived-in does not qualify, because the statute limits deductions to costs “necessary to return the dwelling unit to its original state when the lessee took possession, reasonable wear and tear excepted.” A landlord who withholds money without reasonable justification faces treble damages: a court can order the landlord to pay three times the amount improperly withheld.1North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Century Code 47-16 – Leasing of Real Property

If You’re Charged Unfairly

If a former landlord deducted carpet charges you believe are unjustified, start with a written demand letter. Explain why you disagree and ask for the funds back. Attach the signed move-in condition statement, dated photos from move-in and move-out, and any carpet cleaning receipts from the tenancy. A lot of disputes end here once the landlord sees the documentation.

When a demand letter does not work, North Dakota small claims court handles monetary disputes up to $15,000, which covers essentially every carpet-related deposit claim.5North Dakota Legislative Branch. North Dakota Century Code 27-08.1 – Small Claims Court Three arguments tend to carry weight: the carpet was already worn out at move-in, the charge exceeded the carpet’s depreciated value, or the landlord failed to send the required itemized statement within 30 days. Any of them can support a ruling for the tenant, and with the treble-damages provision in play, a small deduction dispute can turn into a meaningful judgment.