Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Philadelphia: Filing, Deadlines, and Verdicts

If you are considering a medical malpractice lawsuit in Philadelphia, the city’s Court of Common Pleas is now open to patients injured anywhere in Pennsylvania, imposes a two-year filing deadline with limited exceptions, requires a sworn expert review before the case can proceed, and places no cap on what a jury can award in compensation.

Who Can File in Philadelphia Now

For twenty years, a Pennsylvania Supreme Court rule required medical malpractice suits to be filed in the county where the alleged harm happened. That rule was rescinded in August 2022 and the change took effect January 1, 2023. Plaintiffs can now file in any county where the defendant can be served, which for large hospital systems and physician groups often includes Philadelphia.¹

The shift was immediate. Philadelphia saw 544 medical malpractice filings in 2023 and 616 in 2024, roughly 46 percent above the 2017–2019 average. By 2024, 47 percent of the cases filed in Philadelphia involved injuries that happened elsewhere in the state.²

The Deadline to File

Pennsylvania gives you two years to file a medical malpractice lawsuit. The clock usually starts on the date of the injury, but under the discovery rule it starts when you knew, or reasonably should have known, that an injury was caused by medical negligence.³

Several situations change that timing:

If the patient is a child, the two years do not begin to run until the child’s 18th birthday, giving minors until age 20 to file.⁴
If a provider concealed evidence of malpractice, the clock does not start until the concealment is discovered.⁴
A seven-year statute of repose caps everything. No matter when you discover the injury, you generally cannot sue more than seven years after the malpractice occurred. The one exception is a foreign object left inside the patient’s body.⁴

What You Must File With the Complaint

Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1042.3 requires a certificate of merit in every medical malpractice case. It is a sworn statement that a qualified medical expert has reviewed the care and concluded the defendant likely fell below the professional standard and caused the injury. You file it with the complaint or within 60 days after. A separate certificate is needed for each defendant, and missing the requirement can get the case dismissed.⁵⁶

The expert behind the certificate, and the one who will testify at trial, must practice in the same or a similar specialty as the defendant, have experience with the specific procedure or treatment at issue, and be actively practicing or teaching in the field. Pennsylvania courts apply the Frye standard, so the expert’s methods must be generally accepted in the scientific community.⁷

Expert testimony can be skipped only when negligence is so obvious that a layperson could see it without medical training. The textbook example is a surgical instrument left inside a patient, which falls under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.⁸

What You Can Recover

Pennsylvania places no cap on compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases. A jury can award whatever it finds reasonable for medical bills, lost earnings, and future care, and whatever it finds reasonable for pain and suffering.⁹ That is one reason Philadelphia verdicts can reach nine figures. Punitive damages, which are reserved for extreme misconduct, are capped at 200 percent of the compensatory award.¹⁰

Pennsylvania uses modified comparative negligence. If you are found 51 percent or more at fault for your own injury, you recover nothing. Below that line, your award is reduced by your percentage of fault. When more than one provider is found negligent, any single defendant can be held responsible for the entire award under the state’s joint liability rule.¹¹

How Philadelphia Handles These Cases

The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas runs a dedicated Medical Malpractice Program under Administrative Judge Daniel J. Anders and Judicial Leader Susan I. Schulman. Every case moves on a defined schedule: a status conference at one year, mandatory exchange of expert reports by 20 to 21 months, a pretrial conference around two years, and trial-ready status by 25 months.¹²

The court pushes hard toward settlement. A Judge Pro Tempore program staffed by 21 experienced medical malpractice attorneys and two senior judges conducts settlement conferences. If no reasonable settlement offer is on the table at the pretrial conference, the case is assigned a trial date within 90 days. If the parties are negotiating in good faith, they typically get up to six months. Monthly settlements averaged 29.6 in 2024, up from 23.9 in 2023.¹³

To absorb the rising caseload, the court planned to increase pretrial conferences to 30–35 per month by March 2025 and to schedule six to eight trials per week by June 2025, up from four to five.¹³

What the Verdicts Look Like

Most cases never see a jury. National data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics shows about 93 percent of medical malpractice lawsuits settle before trial.¹⁴

Among those that do, outcomes in Philadelphia vary year to year. Between 2016 and 2019, defendants won 59 to 69 percent of trials in Philadelphia, compared with 67 to 85 percent statewide.¹⁵ In 2021, doctors prevailed in only 30 percent of the ten Philadelphia trials that reached a verdict, against a 69 percent defense win rate statewide.¹⁴ In 2024, the court’s own data showed defense verdicts in 73 percent of jury cases.¹³

When plaintiffs win in Philadelphia, awards can be very large. A sample:

$207.6 million against Penn Medicine in a 2018 birth injury case. A jury found the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania liable in April 2023 for failing to perform a timely cesarean section on a mother with chorioamnionitis, after which the infant developed spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. The verdict was reported at figures ranging from $182.7 million to $191.7 million, with roughly $110 million for future medical care, $80 million in noneconomic damages, and $1.7 million for lost future earnings. Judge Gwendolyn N. Bright denied a new trial and added $24.9 million in delay damages in January 2024. The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the full $207.6 million judgment on July 10, 2025.¹⁶¹⁷¹⁸¹⁹
$108.6 million in March 2026 to a family whose child suffered permanent neurological brain damage during a 2018 forceps delivery at Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, now Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital.²⁰
$44.1 million in April 2016 in Tate v. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, where staff stopped monitoring the plaintiff’s blood coagulation levels for two days while continuing heparin, and the patient suffered a massive brain hemorrhage. The jury assigned 65 percent of the fault to the hospital and 35 percent to the attending physician.²¹
$35 million in 2026 in Spencer v. Penn Medicine, where the plaintiff alleged she underwent an unnecessary full hysterectomy after a false cancer diagnosis. The jury assigned $12.25 million to Penn Medicine and an associated physician. Main Line Health settled separately for an undisclosed amount, and Penn Medicine has indicated it plans to appeal.²²

What Could Change

The venue rule that opened Philadelphia to statewide filings is under political pressure. Senator Cris Dush introduced Senate Bill 125 in the 2025 session, a proposed constitutional amendment that would move rulemaking authority over civil procedure from the Supreme Court to the legislature and let the General Assembly set venue rules directly. A public hearing was held on October 27, 2025. Two days later, Dush demanded the release of findings from a required two-year reexamination of the 2022 rule amendments, which had been due by January 1, 2025, but had not been made public.²³ Any constitutional amendment must pass both chambers in two consecutive legislative sessions and then be ratified by voters, so the current filing rules will remain in effect for the near term.¹

1
Spotlight PA. PA Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Venue Shopping Supreme Court
2
Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform. Number of Medical Malpractice Cases Filed in Philadelphia Continues to Rise
3
Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Lawyers. Statutes of Limitations
4
Matzus Law. Understanding the Discovery Rule in Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Cases
5
Pennsylvania Code. 231 Pa. Code Rule 1042.3
6
Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Lawyers. Special Requirements Before Filing a Medical Malpractice Case
7
Your Erie Lawyers. Why Expert Testimony Matters in Pennsylvania Malpractice Cases
8
My Philly Lawyer. Expert Witnesses in PA Medical Malpractice Cases
9
Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Lawyers. Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Laws No Caps on Compensatory Damages
10
Reiff Law Firm. What Are Non-Economic Damages in Pennsylvania
11
Your Erie Lawyers. Comparative Negligence in Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice
12
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Medical Malpractice Case Management Order
13
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Medical Malpractice Program Webinar
14
Raynes Law. Are Medical Malpractice Suits Hard to Win in Philadelphia
15
Morris Wilson. Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Jury Verdicts in Philadelphia, Montgomery, Delaware, Chester, Bucks Counties
16
Gilman & Bedigian. Jury Hits Penn Medicine With Over $180M Record Verdict
17
Expert Institute. Jury Awards $183M for Birth Injury at Penn Medicine Hospital
18
Childbirth Injuries. Judge Increases Pennsylvania Birth Injury Verdict
19
The Legal Intelligencer. Superior Court Upholds $207.6M Birth Injury Judgment Against Penn Hospital
20
Childbirth Injuries. $108 Million by Pennsylvania Birth Injury Lawyers
21
Gilman & Bedigian. Philadelphia Woman Receives $44.1 Million for Negligent Medical Care
22
Expert Institute. Latest Medical Malpractice Verdicts
23
Senator Dush. Dush Demands PA Supreme Court Ruling on Trial Lawyer Venue Shopping Before Upcoming Election