Texas Penal Code Section 42.072 is the state’s stalking statute. It makes it a third-degree felony to engage in a repeated pattern of conduct, directed at a specific person, that the actor knows or should know will be perceived as threatening bodily injury, death, or damage to property, and that in fact causes the target and a reasonable person in the same situation to feel fear or serious distress. A first conviction carries two to ten years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. A second stalking conviction is a second-degree felony with a prison range of two to twenty years.
What the State Has to Prove
A stalking case under 42.072 has three elements, and the prosecution must establish all of them beyond a reasonable doubt.
The conduct has to happen more than once and be part of the same course of behavior aimed at a specific person. One incident, however alarming, isn’t enough. The statute lets a jury treat different kinds of acts as a single pattern so long as they’re directed at the same target.1State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 42.072 – Stalking
The conduct also has to either qualify as harassment under Section 42.07 or be conduct the defendant knew, or reasonably should have known, the target would perceive as threatening bodily injury, death, or harm to the target’s family, household, dating partner, or property. “Property” here is defined more broadly than most people expect and includes pets, companion animals, and assistance animals.1State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 42.072 – Stalking
Finally, the behavior has to actually cause the target fear or distress, and it has to be the kind of behavior that would cause a reasonable person in similar circumstances to feel the same way. That two-part test keeps the case from resting entirely on an unusually sensitive reaction while still accounting for the context of the relationship.1State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 42.072 – Stalking
What Counts as Stalking Conduct
Because 42.072 pulls in the harassment statute, the range of qualifying conduct is wide. Section 42.07 covers threatening someone with bodily injury or a felony in a way likely to alarm them, repeated anonymous phone calls, repeated electronic communications meant to harass or alarm, and repeated social media posts intended to cause emotional distress. It also reaches tracking or monitoring a person’s property or vehicle without effective consent, whether through a tracking app, a GPS device, or physical following.2State of Texas. Texas Penal Code Section 42.07 – Harassment
A prosecutor doesn’t need a single dramatic event. A case can be built from a mix: a few threatening texts, some unwanted appearances at a workplace, a tracking app quietly installed on a phone. The jury is allowed to treat those together as one pattern, so switching tactics doesn’t reset the count.1State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 42.072 – Stalking
The statute also picks up conduct that falls outside the specific harassment definitions. If the acts don’t technically fit Section 42.07 but the defendant knew or should have known they’d be perceived as threatening, they still count.1State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 42.072 – Stalking
Penalty for a First Conviction
A first-time stalking conviction under 42.072 is a third-degree felony. The prison range is two to ten years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and the court can add a fine of up to $10,000.3State of Texas. Texas Penal Code Section 12.34 – Third Degree Felony Punishment Depending on the circumstances and the defendant’s background, a judge may impose community supervision instead of prison time.
A felony record shows up on background checks for employment, housing, and professional licensing, and Texas licensing boards in fields like healthcare, education, law enforcement, and real estate run moral-character reviews that a felony conviction complicates.
Enhancement for a Repeat Offense
If the defendant has a prior stalking conviction under 42.072, the new charge is automatically a second-degree felony. The same enhancement applies if the prior was under a substantially similar law in another state, a federally recognized tribe’s jurisdiction, a U.S. territory, or federal law.1State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 42.072 – Stalking
A second-degree felony carries two to twenty years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.4State of Texas. Texas Penal Code Section 12.33 – Second Degree Felony Punishment The prior conviction does not have to involve the same victim. A prior stalking conviction against a completely different person still triggers the enhancement.
Loss of Firearm Rights
Under Texas Penal Code 46.04, a person convicted of any felony cannot possess a firearm for five years after release from prison or the end of community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision, whichever comes later. After that window, the restriction narrows rather than disappears: the person may possess a firearm only at the place where they live. Carrying it anywhere else is still a crime, and violating the restriction is itself a third-degree felony.5State of Texas. Texas Penal Code Section 46.04 – Unlawful Possession of Firearm
Federal law is stricter. Under 18 U.S.C. 922(g), a person convicted of any felony is barred from possessing firearms or ammunition entirely, with no five-year sunset and no home exception. Because state and federal firearm laws run independently, a stalking conviction creates a permanent federal firearms disability even after the Texas restriction partially lifts.
Immigration Consequences for Noncitizens
Federal immigration law treats stalking as a specific ground for deportation. Under 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(E), a noncitizen convicted of a crime of stalking at any time after admission is deportable.6Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 8 USC 1227 – Deportable Aliens
Violating a protective order is a separate deportability ground if the court finds the person engaged in conduct violating the protection-against-violence or harassment provisions of the order. A noncitizen arrested for stalking who later breaks bond conditions or a protective order can face two independent grounds for removal. Immigration judges don’t have the same discretion as criminal courts to weigh mitigating factors, and removal can move forward even if the criminal sentence is light. Anyone in this position should talk to an immigration attorney before agreeing to any plea.6Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 8 USC 1227 – Deportable Aliens
Bond Conditions and Protective Orders
After an arrest on a stalking charge, the court usually sets bond conditions aimed at keeping the accused away from the alleged victim before trial. Texas Penal Code 25.07 makes violating those conditions a separate crime. Conditions can prohibit contact with the victim or the victim’s family in any threatening or harassing manner, keep the defendant away from the victim’s home, workplace, or a child’s school, and bar possession of firearms while the case is pending.7State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 25.07 – Violation of Certain Court Orders or Conditions of Bond in a Stalking Case
Courts can also order GPS monitoring, and specific conditions may forbid tracking or monitoring the victim’s property or vehicle by any means. A violation while on bond gives prosecutors an added charge on top of the underlying case and often leads to bond revocation.7State of Texas. Texas Code Penal 25.07 – Violation of Certain Court Orders or Conditions of Bond in a Stalking Case
On the victim’s side, Chapter 7A of the Code of Criminal Procedure lets a person targeted by a 42.072 offense apply for a protective order regardless of any prior relationship with the offender; a parent or guardian can file on behalf of a minor, and a prosecutor can file on behalf of the victim.8State of Texas. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 7A.01 – Application for Protective Order These orders generally last up to two years under Title 4 of the Family Code, but the court can extend the order beyond two years when the underlying offense is a felony, and stalking always is.9State of Texas. Texas Family Code 85.025 – Duration of Protective Order If the offender is imprisoned when the order would otherwise expire, it automatically extends for one to two years after release, depending on sentence length.
When Federal Stalking Charges Overlap
Conduct that crosses state lines or uses interstate communications can also trigger federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 2261A, separate from any Texas charge. Federal jurisdiction attaches when the defendant travels across state lines with intent to harass, intimidate, or surveil, or when the defendant uses mail, the internet, or any interstate electronic communication service in a course of conduct that puts the target in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury.10Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2261A – Stalking
The federal statute reaches fear directed at the target, their immediate family, a spouse or intimate partner, and even the target’s pet, service animal, or emotional support animal. It also covers conduct that causes or would be expected to cause substantial emotional distress, without any explicit physical threat. Someone harassing a person in another state entirely through social media, email, or text from Texas can face both state and federal charges at once.10Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2261A – Stalking
Common Defenses
The most direct defense attacks the elements. Because 42.072 requires a connected pattern aimed at a specific person, a defendant who can show the incidents were isolated and unrelated may defeat the charge. And if the alleged behavior wouldn’t put a reasonable person in fear under similar circumstances, the objective test fails regardless of how the complainant felt.
Speech-based cases raise First Amendment issues that courts take seriously. Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Counterman v. Colorado (2023), prosecutors must prove the defendant was at least reckless about whether their communications would be understood as threatening. Messages that are annoying, offensive, or unwelcome but not threatening will not support a stalking conviction. Section 42.07(a)(8), the social media provision of the harassment statute, also has a built-in exception for communications made in connection with a matter of public concern.2State of Texas. Texas Penal Code Section 42.07 – Harassment
Consent can matter too. The tracking provision requires monitoring “without the other person’s effective consent,” so a defendant who had permission to share location data through a mutual app can attack the tracking element. Consent arguments rarely carry the day when the wider pattern involves threats or intimidation, because agreeing to one form of contact isn’t agreement to a campaign of fear.2State of Texas. Texas Penal Code Section 42.07 – Harassment